|
Atlanta - Nonablative treatment with a 1320nm Nd:YAG or 1450nm
diode laser offers a viable option for achieving moderate improvement
in the appearance of atrophic acne scars with no downtime, according
to preliminary results from a randomized study conducted at the
Washington Institute of Dermatologic Laser Surgery, Washington.

Atrophic scars before treatment (left) and three months following
series of three SmoothBeam laser treatments. |
"These nonablative lasers have been proven safe and effective
for improving rhytids by stimulating dermal collagen synthesis,
and so it seemed rational that they might also be used to treat
atrophic acne scars. Our results so far indicate both systems are
a good addition to our armamentarium for treating atrophic acne
scars, and those observations are consistent with some recent reports
describing efficacy during short-term follow-up of patients treated
with a 1320nm Nd:YAG laser.
However, we are continuing to observe our patients in order to
evaluate the longevity of the effects and if there are any relative
efficacy differences between these systems," said Elizabeth
L. Tanzi, M.D., a fellow at the Washington practice under the direction
of Tina Alster, M.D.
The study used a split-face design and included 20 patients with
skin phototypes I to V who received three treatments at monthly
intervals to the full cheeks and temple region using a 1320nm Nd:YAG
laser (CoolTouch) on one side and a 1450nm diode (Smoothbeam) laser
contralaterally. Dr. Tanzi administered all of the laser treatments
with the same technique, applying nonoverlapping pulses to produce
transient erythema and swelling without blistering.

Atrophic scars before treatment
(left) and three months following series of three CoolTouch
II laser treatments. |
Outcome assessments, including clinical ratings improvement by
two independent investigators examining pretreatment and posttreatment
digital photographs, patient satisfaction ratings, objective in
vivo measurement of surface textural change using three-dimensional
microtopography, and histopathologic assessment for dermal fibroplasia
in biopsy specimens taken from a subgroup of patients, were planned
at study visits over a 12-month period after the last treatment.
Follow-up to six months indicates that there is progressive improvement
over time, becoming evident at a follow-up visit three months after
the last treatment. Overall, the changes have been mild to moderate
- at six months, investigator improvement ratings averaged about
45 percent, with mild to moderate atrophic scars appearing to respond
better than more severe "icepick" scars.
So far, the results in all efficacy end points show a modest advantage
of the 1450nm diode laser over the 1320nm Nd:YAG laser, although
the difference is slight, Dr. Tanzi said.
Both of the laser treatments were very well tolerated. The only
side effects recorded included erythema and edema lasting up to
six hours after treatment with the 1320nm Nd:YAG laser and up to
24 hours posttreatment with the 1450nm diode laser. Both lasers
were associated with development of temporary postinflammatory hyperpigmentation
in a small proportion of patients. There were no cases of scarring
or any adverse textural changes.
"Ablative laser procedures with the CO2 or erbium:YAG lasers
are very effective for treating atrophic acne scars, but postoperative
recovery can be significant and they also carry potential risks
for more persistent pigmentary changes. These nonablative laser
treatments appear to be a possible option for patients who are unwilling
or unable to experience downtime and who accept the tradeoff of
a less dramatic treatment benefit," Dr. Tanzi said.
The CoolTouch laser is a product of CoolTouch Corp. The SmoothBeam
is manufactured by Candela Corp. Dr. Tanzi has no financial interest
in either company.
|