Main Office: Galleria
Phone: 713.850.0023
Fax: 713.627.2536
 
 
Learning Center
  Procedures
 
  • Blepharoplasty
  • Botox ®
  • Breast Surgery
  • Cosmetic Surgery
  • EpiLight
  • Laser Resurfacing
  • Laser Treatments
  • Liposuction
  • Microdermabrasion
  • Nose Reshaping
  • OBAGI
  • Photorejuvenation
  • Pulse Light Facial
  • Sclerotherapy
  •   Common Issues
     
  • Acne
  • Hair Removal
  • Healthy Heart
  • Melasma
  • Other Skin Problems
  • Rosacea
  • Smoking Cessation
  • Stress Management
  • Stretch Marks
  • Sun-Damaged Skin
  • Vein Treatment
  • Weight Loss
  • Wrinkle Reduction
  • High-Intensity Flashlamp Photoepilation
    from N. S. Sadick, Archives of Dermatology
     

    ABSTRACT:

    Objective:

    To examine the clinical, histological and immunohistological effects of flashlamp photoepilation.

    Design:

    Nonrandomized control trial with blinded histological study and follow-up of 1 to 20 months.

    Setting:

    Private academic practice.

    Subjects:

    Sixty-seven subjects (10 males and 57 females) with areas of excess body hair.

    Interventions:

    Single (9 subjects) or multiple (58 subjects) treatments (noncoherent, 590-1200 nm, 2.9-3.0 milliseconds, 40-42 J/cm2) to hairy skin. From subjects given a single treatment, biopsy samples were taken immediately after treatment and at different intervals for up to 20 months.

    Mean Outcome Measures:

    Clinical measures include hair counts and morphologic features before and after treatment. Histological measures include terminal-vellus and anagen-other ratios, hair shaft diameter, and morphologic features (routine and immunohistochemical detection of bcl-2, bax, p53, Ki67, cyclin D1, and hsp70) before and after treatment.

    Results:

    Mean hair loss after photoepilation was 49%, 57%, and 54% for a single treatment and 47%, 56%, and 64% for multiple treatments at follow-up of less than 3 months, 3 to less than 6 months, and 6 months or longer, respectively (P<.05 for all comparisons). Transient erythema was seen in all subjects; no scarring occurred. Histologically, treatment caused morphologic damage confined to hair follicles and shafts. Terminal vellus and anagen-telogen ratios, mean hair shaft diameter, and immunohistochemical profiles were not significantly modified by treatment. Treatment did not alter other skin adnexa, epidermis, or vessels.

    Conclusions:

    Flashlamp treatment leads to significant, long-lasting epilation. The predominant mechanism seems to be via selective photothermal damage to large, pigmented hair follicles rather than induction of a programmed state of follicular cycle arrest or follicular miniaturization.

     
    Medical Disclaimer: The information on this web site is for general informational purposes only. It is not a substitute for a medical evaluation. If you feel that medical interventions are necessary, please check with your physician. Read our Privacy Policy.